Strategic Capacity Management for Competitive Advantage: A Systematic Literature Review of Operational, Technological, and Sustainability Perspectives

Authors

  • Masduki Asbari Universitas Insan Pembangunan Indonesia, Indonesia Author https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2460-9171
  • Dewiana Novitasari Universitas Insan Pembangunan Indonesia, Indonesia Author
  • Firdaus Putra Universitas Insan Pembangunan Indonesia, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70508/zzkdbd73

Keywords:

capacity management, supply chain, operational efficiency, strategic optimisation, dynamic capabilities

Abstract

Capacity management has become a critical strategic imperative for global organisations in the face of uncertain and complex market dynamics. This comprehensive literature review analyses 11 reputable Scopus Q1 articles (2021–2026) addressing capacity management within the contexts of supply chains, manufacturing, tourism, and business systems. This study identifies five key dimensions: (1) volume flexibility and capacity management, (2) supply chain capacity management and resilience, (3) destination capacity, (4) production planning and manufacturing capacity, and (5) business process optimisation. The analysis reveals a significant shift from a purely tactical-operational approach towards a holistic perspective that integrates strategic, technological, and sustainability dimensions. Empirical findings indicate that companies optimising production capacity utilisation achieve 15–30% higher operational efficiency than their competitors, with average global capacity utilisation reaching only 70–80% across all industrial sectors. This research synthesises three main theoretical frameworks—the Resource-Based View (RBV), the Dynamic Capability View (DCV), and the Technology-Organisation-Environment (TOE) framework—to develop a comprehensive understanding of capacity management as a driver of competitive advantage. Innovative contributions include: (1) a systematic mapping of the contemporary capacity management research landscape that identifies emerging trends and the evolution of intellectual discourse; (2) a holistic integration of operational, strategic, technological, and sustainability perspectives previously fragmented across the literature; and (3) the identification of critical research gaps and future research directions that guide academic inquiry and industrial practice. Research impact: This literature review bridges a significant knowledge-practice gap in the implementation of capacity management, particularly for SMEs and emerging markets, and provides a practical framework for integrating AI, IoT, and cloud computing technologies into capacity decision-making systems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Acevedo-Urquiaga, A. J., Quintero, O. L., Tamayo, P. A., Revuelta-Licea, E., Urquijo-Rodríguez, A. F., Sablón-Cossío, N., & Acevedo-Suárez, J. A. (2025). Neural network predictions of small business competitiveness in a sustainable short supply chain business model for rooftop farming in a neighbourhood in Bogotá. Results in Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.107938

Al-Haraizah, A., Ismaeel, B., Abdelfattah, F. A., & Albdour, A. (2026). The evolution of consumer trends and business performance through AI-based marketing: A performance perspective. Acta Psychologica. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.106236

Bimpizas-Pinis, M., Calzolari, T., & Genovese, A. (2022). Exploring the transition towards circular supply chains through integration arcs. International Journal of Production Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108666

Chen, S., Li, Z., Han, B., & Ma, H. (2021). Managerial ability, internal control, and investment efficiency. Journal of Behavioural and Experimental Finance. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2021.100523

Gao, P., & Perdana, A. (2026). The ESG flow-return paradox: Green sentiment boosts inflows but lags in returns. Journal of Environmental Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.128385

Munsamy, M., Telukdarie, A., & Matjuta, P. (2023). Modelling and optimisation of water systems. Procedia Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.12.266

Pereira-Moliner, J., Villar-García, M., Molina-Azorín, J. F., Tarí, J. J., López-Gamero, M. D., & Pertusa-Ortega, E. M. (2024). Using tourism intelligence and big data to explain flight searches to tourist destinations: A case study of the Costa Blanca (Spain). Tourism Management Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2024.101243

Schmuck, R. (2021). Education and training in manufacturing processes and supply chains using business simulation games. Procedia Manufacturing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2021.10.076

Tran, T. T. H., Broeke, M. V. den, & Paparoidamis, N. G. (2025). The dual role of flexibility in driving innovation ambidexterity and firm performance. Journal of Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115314

Tran, Y. T., Chau, T. H. P., & Pham, Q. T. (2025). Transformational leadership and firm performance: The mediating role of innovation capacity and the use of management accounting systems. Sustainable Futures. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100988

Türkeș, M. C., Stăncioiu, A. F., & Marinescu, R.-C. (2024). Modelling the impact of resilience factors and relational practices on supply chain performance. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2024.100533

Published

2026-08-03

How to Cite

Asbari, M., Novitasari, D. ., & Putra, F. (2026). Strategic Capacity Management for Competitive Advantage: A Systematic Literature Review of Operational, Technological, and Sustainability Perspectives. Indonesian Journal of Management and Economic Research, 3(2), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.70508/zzkdbd73

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >> 

Similar Articles

21-30 of 31

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.