Higher Education Leadership and Policy Implementation: A Qualitative Exploration of Strategic Decision-Making
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70508/5ndrqs04Abstract
This qualitative study explores the strategic decision-making practices of higher education leaders in Indonesia during the implementation of national policy directives. Drawing on in-depth, semi-structured interviews and document analysis, the research employs a thematic analysis approach to investigate how rectors, deans, and senior academic administrators interpret, negotiate, and enact educational reforms. The findings reveal three interrelated leadership dynamics: strategic mediation, symbolic and practical alignment, and distributed decision spaces. Through a dialectical engagement with strategic leadership and institutional theory, the study develops an integrative conceptual model that reconceptualizes policy implementation as an iterative and context-sensitive process. This model contributes theoretical novelty by synthesizing competing paradigms and offers practical insights for advancing reflexive, policy-literate leadership in complex governance environments.
Downloads
References
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 19(3), 552–572. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
Chasokela, D. (2025). Ethical considerations in qualitative educational research. In Qualitative Approaches to Pedagogical Engineering (pp. 26–42). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-6021-7.ch003
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
Divjak, B., & Begičević Ređep, N. (2015). Strategic decision-making cycle in higher education: Case of strategic goals and performance indicators. International Journal of Quality Assurance in Engineering and Technology Education, 4(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJQAETE.2015070101
Fumasoli, T., & Hladchenko, M. (2024). University leadership and institutional autonomy: A conceptual reconsideration. Higher Education Policy. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-023-00295-w
Fumasoli, T., Gornitzka, Å., & Maassen, P. (2020). Academic leaders and reform agendas: Leadership in context. Tertiary Education and Management, 26(4), 367–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11233-020-09062-8
Gigliotti, R. A. (2017). An exploratory study of academic leadership education within the Association of American Universities. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 9(2), 196–210. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-11-2015-0080
Guiomar, N., & Costa e Silva, A. (2025). Leadership agency and symbolic negotiation in Portuguese universities. Higher Education Policy. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-025-00345-9
Hladchenko, M., & Benninghoff, M. (2020). The institutional autonomy of universities: A multidimensional conceptual framework. Higher Education Quarterly, 74(2), 172–187. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12232
Huisman, J., & Mampaey, J. (2018). Institutional profiling in higher education: Managing institutional positioning and branding. Higher Education Policy, 31(4), 517–534. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-017-0059-4
James, M., & Derrick, G. E. (2020). Governing academic research impact in UK higher education institutions: Strategies and tensions. Studies in Higher Education, 45(4), 745–760. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1554492
Klenke, K. (2016). Qualitative research in the study of leadership (2nd ed.). Emerald Group Publishing.
Kushnir, I. (2025). Thematic analysis in the area of education: A practical guide. Cogent Education, 12(1), 2471645. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2471645
Mintzberg, H. (1994). The rise and fall of strategic planning. Free Press.
Pietilä, M. (2024). Beyond compliance: Exploring leadership agency in university governance. Higher Education Policy. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-024-00311-3
Singun, A. J. (2025). Unveiling the barriers to digital transformation in higher education institutions: A systematic literature review. Discover Education, 4(37). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00430-9
Tomaszewski, L. E., Zarestky, J., & Gonzalez, E. (2020). Planning qualitative research: Design and decision making for new researchers. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920967174
Uhl-Bien, M., & Arena, M. (2018). Leadership for organizational adaptability: A theoretical synthesis and integrative framework. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(1), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.12.009
Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R., & McKelvey, B. (2007). Complexity leadership theory: Shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(4), 298–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.04.002
Wa-Mbaleka, S. (2019). Ethics in qualitative research: A practical guide. International Forum, 22(2), 116–132.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Indonesian Journal of Management and Economic Research (IJOMER)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
